How TV and Movies Will Change Abortion Narrative After Roe v. Wade – The Hollywood Reporter


In 1972, a two-part episode of Norman Lear’s groundbreaking comedy Maud saw its main character unexpectedly pregnant and 47 years old. During two episodes of primetime television, Bea Arthur’s Maude weighed the decision to have an abortion. A year later, in 1973, a constitutional right to abortion was established by the Supreme Court’s decision on Roe vs. Wade. “Forty years later, it’s a more sensitive topic than it was then,” Lear said. The Hollywood Reporter in a 2020 interview.

Since Maud, abortion, the right to procreation and contraception appear more and more on the screen. After the Supreme Court decision Dobbs decision which annuls deer June 24, THR spoke with showrunners and filmmakers behind some of the recent series and movies that have included abortions in storylines and shown characters realistically receiving abortions and reproductive care. Creators love Vidais Tanya Saracho and Pregnant Director Rachel Lee Goldberg reveals what personally led them to tell these stories and the process to bring them to the screen.

They also discuss what they think the role of entertainment could be in a post-deer country.

“Every woman I’ve spoken to since this happened is completely enraged,” says Aline Brosh McKenna, whose musical Crazy ex-girlfriend saw a character get an abortion. In the wake of deer being flipped, the showrunner says there will be content that deals with the new realities of seeking abortion care, and her thoughts are echoed by many below: “I think it forces a lot of women to think differently their role in the world, and that will inevitably be reflected in writing and art.


Comments are closed.