Donald Trump’s DNA, not a statement sought in a defamation lawsuit


The lawyer for a woman who accused former President Donald Trump of raping her in the mid-1990s and then sued him for defamation, said on Tuesday she would not seek to depose Trump until the trial because it would cause unnecessary delay, but she added that a DNA sample was still wanted.

Attorney Roberta Kaplan first made the revelation in Manhattan federal court during a preliminary hearing before explaining the decision to reporters in court as her client, E. Jean Carroll, stood by her side .

A deposition, Kaplan said, “would inevitably cause undue delay.”

“We want the case to move forward,” she said.

Lawyer Alina Habba, who represented Trump at the hearing, said in court that she had never heard before that Carroll’s lawyers did not want a deposition, a procedure in which lawyers in the cases civilians interview likely witnesses under oath before the trial.

“It’s surprising,” Habba said.

As for a DNA sample, Habba said, “None were requested.”

Kaplan, however, said the DNA sample was requested after the case was first filed in state court and the request still exists after it was transferred to federal court.

The Associated Press does not generally identify people alleging sexual assault, but Carroll consented to be named in the media.

She told reporters outside court that she looked forward to the trial on behalf of all the women “who have been grabbed and groped, assaulted and raped by men in power and silenced.”

“And we are seeking justice, at least in this case, against a powerful man,” she said.

Carroll said she would “never, ever settle down”.

” It’s a matter of principle. It’s about a powerful man who assaults and rapes a woman and then gets away with it. It’s not right,” she said.

Carroll, in a June 2019 book, said Trump raped her in the mid-1990s at an upscale Manhattan department store.

The excerpt from the book prompted Trump to deny the allegations and question Carroll’s credibility and motives in a statement from his White House press office, comments in an Oval Office interview and statements to the media as he boarded a helicopter for Camp David.

The 2nd United States Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to ultimately rule on Trump’s request to be replaced as a defendant in the lawsuit filed by the United States.

The US Department of Justice has claimed that Trump cannot be held personally responsible for “rude and disrespectful” remarks he made about Carroll because he was president at the time.

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who presided over Tuesday’s hearing, ruled last October that Trump could not use a law protecting federal employees from being sued individually for things they do as part of their job. use.

He also denied a request by Trump’s attorneys to delay progress in the trial, including depositions, until the 2nd Circuit decides whether Trump can be replaced as a defendant.


Comments are closed.